MilkyWay (MILK) offers liquid staking and restaking for modular chains, letting users earn triple yields while supporting AVS services like oracles and bridges.

Modular blockchain architectures are growing more popular in the industry as an alternative to monolithic designs. For instance, chains like 

 (TIA) eloquently separate their consensus layers from other infrastructural components for more flexible and accessible validation services. At the same time, validator ecosystems on Celestia and similar modular networks can benefit immensely from attracting additional staking funds to provide more reliable services.

MilkyWay (MILK) is a decentralized protocol that aims to do just that — provide 

 services in order to support modular blockchains, as well as various Actively Validated Services (AVS). Having started as one of the first liquid staking providers for the Celestia blockchain back in December 2023, MilkyWay added the restaking functionality to its service line in late 2024. As of May 2025, it’s emerged as one of the few 

 (DeFi) protocols to support both liquid staking and restaking, allowing you to earn yields on the same funds from up to three sources — native staking on the original chain, liquid staking, and restaking that supports a variety of bridges, oracles, rollups and other AVS-based platforms.

MilkyWay currently provides liquid staking services for three blockchains — Celestia, Initia (INIT) and Babylon (BABY). The platform’s restaking service is also flexible, allowing you to choose between three different modes — platform-managed, operator-specific or AVS-specific.

 (MILK) is a decentralized platform that offers liquid staking and restaking services, focusing on three Cosmos-based blockchains: Celestia, Initia and Babylon. 

It’s one of the rare platforms that supports both liquid staking and restaking, allowing you to utilize your crypto funds to derive income simultaneously from up to three sources — native staking, liquid staking and restaking to support AVS.

Similar to the networks it supports, MilkyWay was built using the Cosmos SDK and is part of the wider 

 ecosystem. It positions itself as a Layer 1 chain, though some critical functions on the protocol — for example, Celestia liquid staking — are carried out by leveraging 

MilkyWay’s inception dates back to December 2023, when it was launched to support liquid staking on the Celestia chain. In late 2024, the platform added support for restaking, emerging as probably the leading solution within the Cosmos ecosystem supporting both of these yield-generating activities.

MilkyWay aims to provide support to modular blockchains, and all three chains it focuses on are based on architectural modularity. Celestia’s network offers outsourced data availability (DA) and 

 (INIT) specializes in the integration between 

 technologies to help address the problem of multi-chain fragmentation. These two networks operate essentially as infrastructure providers. In turn, 

 focuses on DeFi — specifically, supporting 

 (BTC) staking. It operates as a modular plug-in solution to enable Bitcoin funds to secure various 

In order to support cross-chain communications and the transfer of liquid staking and restaking assets across different native environments, MilkyWay has implemented support for two bridging solutions: Hyperlane and IBC Eureka.

The MilkyWay liquid staking protocol allows stakers of Celestia’s TIA, Initia’s INIT and Babylon’s BABY tokens to reuse their funds for additional yield throughout the DeFi ecosystem. For Celestia liquid staking, when you deposit your TIA funds on MilkyWay, you’re issued a liquid representation of your staked position in the form of the milkTIA 

, which can then be used on DeFi protocols for lending, borrowing, collateral and more.

When you stake TIA via MilkyWay, your funds are delegated to established validators on the Celestia network. In the future, this delegation process will be governed by the MilkyWay 

 (DAO). Your staked TIA is first transferred from Celestia to the Osmosis chain, where MilkyWay maintains smart contracts governing the process. The smart contracts are used to calculate the proper amount of milkTIA, which is then minted and sent to your Osmosis wallet.

The original TIA funds are then sent from Osmosis to the Celestia chain. These transfers are executed using the IBC bridge, a major bridging protocol within the Cosmos ecosystem. A MilkyWay coordinator node is then responsible for allocating the TIA to validators used by the platform. As your staked tokens accumulate rewards on Celestia, you’re free to use your milkTIA on other platforms for additional yield.

Similar processes, though with some technical differences, are used for INIT and BABY liquid staking. For INIT, when you deposit your funds on MilkyWay, they’re sent from the Initia Layer 1 chain to an Initia-linked Layer 2, where the protocol maintains another set of smart contracts. These smart contracts calculate the requisite amount of milkINIT (the liquid staking representation of the original INIT) and send it to your wallet, at which point you’re free to use your milkINIT LST in DeFi protocols. The original INIT is transferred back to the Initia mainnet and allocated to select validators to earn staking rewards.

BABY liquid staking works quite similarly — your BABY staked assets will be allocated to MilkyWay’s validators on the Babylon chain to earn native staking rewards, and you’ll also be issued 

 as an LST to use for additional yield on DeFi solutions.

MilkyWay’s restaking service allows you to further reuse your staked funds to secure a variety of decentralized platforms and services. Major blockchain networks typically have no shortage of validators to secure their consensus layers. However, there are additional services and applications that service the blockchain networks, but experience a lack of necessary validator ecosystems of their own. These may include blockchain price 

 or rollup sequencers — services collectively known as AVS.

To help provide network security and support the operations of these AVS-based solutions, MilkyWay offers you the ability to use your original staked funds for restaking. The key difference between liquid staking and restaking is that the former only lets you reuse your staked funds on DeFi protocols, while the latter is designed for supporting validation mechanisms of various AVS solutions.

In essence, restaking provides a third way to utilize your original crypto funds by securing AVS via liquid restaking tokens (LRTs).

To get issued a liquid restaking token on MilkyWay, you can deposit Layer 1 native tokens — TIA, INIT and BABY — or LSTs — milkTIA, milkINIT and milkBABY. Additionally, MilkyWay also accepts the 

After depositing an accepted crypto token, you’ll be issued your LRT and can choose from various AVS services on which to restake. MilkyWay offers three options for restakers: 

The operator and service restaking modes are optimal for experienced stakers and restakers, who can objectively evaluate the reward potential of each validator or AVS they pick.

Developers, validators and AVS operators also benefit from MilkyWay's services. An infrastructure provider — such as an institutional validator node or AVS operator — may partner with the platform to have MilkyWay user funds directed to them for staking or restaking. This can serve as a significant income stream for these individuals or entities.

As of May 2025, the MilkyWay network uses the services of 11 validator nodes. MilkyWay validators enjoy numerous benefits, the most obvious one being the ability to attract staking funds from users. They may also participate in restaking by reusing their stakes to secure the various AVS available through the platform.

MilkyWay's cross-chain communications are supported by two key bridging solutions: IBC Eureka and Hyperlane. These platforms allow users to transfer tokens across different blockchain environments in order to access a variety of DeFi protocols, networks and AVS.

MilkyWay’s programmable rules are logic conditions that control how, where and under what conditions restaked assets are used (e.g., only restake to certain services or limit the slashing risk). There are two types of rules: 

A key difference between MilkyWay and other restaking providers is its hybrid opt-in model that allows you to choose exactly how your restaked funds are used — through a pooled allocation by the platform itself, or by your delegation to a specific operator or service. In contrast, many other restaking platforms simply handle your funds on your behalf, giving you only limited control over the selection of the restaking target.

MilkyWay also protects your overall funds by allowing you to apportion your restaked funds over multiple operators or AVS. In this way, if one operator or AVS fails or gets slashed, your total investment isn’t entirely impacted.

What is the MilkyWay crypto token (MILK)?

MilkyWay’s native token, MILK, is used for governance, gas fee payments, transaction processing and the provision of on-chain liquidity. Although MilkyWay was launched in 2023, MILK wasn’t launched until late April 2025. With a total supply of 1 billion, the MILK token’s supply allocation shares are per the chart below:

The MilkyWay project has announced an airdrop campaign, the Massdrop, the first phase of which began along with MILK's token generation event (TGE) on Apr 29, 2025. During phase 1 of the airdrop, you can 

 until May 29, 2025, or through participating crypto exchanges.

Where to buy the MilkyWay crypto token (MILK)

You can buy the MILK token on Bybit's Spot market as a swap pair with USDT (

MilkyWay has challenged traditional staking models by offering an extremely versatile set of liquid staking and restaking services. With MilkyWay, savvy DeFi users can simultaneously earn yield on the same funds from up to three sources. In addition to featuring an unparalleled variety of avenues for yield, MilkyWay lets you do the noble thing — provide support to various modular blockchains and AVS operations with your crypto staking and restaking.

Intermediate

milkyway crypto.png

MilkyWay (MILK): Liquid staking and restaking for the modular era

The US is shifting toward lighter, innovation-friendly crypto regulation, with moves like the FIT21 Act, a repeal of SAB 121 and a more lenient SEC approach.

, but the rules governing it remain a tangled web of state laws, federal agency guidelines and developing court rulings. With the US moving toward clearer policies, crypto investors and innovators are left navigating a fragmented regulatory space. This article discusses current US crypto regulations, explores major regulatory challenges and the country’s stance on crypto, and examines the relevance of current US rules to traders and the larger industry.

Crypto regulations are legal frameworks set by governments to manage the creation, trading, taxation and use of digital assets. These regulations aim to protect consumers, prevent illegal activities and maintain market integrity.

The US regulatory stance on cryptocurrency in 2025 is moving toward greater clarity and support for innovation, though a unified federal framework is still in the works. 

, passed by the House of Representatives in 2024, aims to establish comprehensive rules for digital assets but has yet to be fully implemented. Signaling a more crypto-friendly direction, the Trump administration issued an 

 in January 2025 to create the President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets, with the goal of “providing regulatory clarity and certainty.” Chaired by David Sacks, the group is tasked with reviewing current laws and recommending reforms to encourage responsible innovation.

Federal agencies are gradually shifting their approach. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), traditionally strict with crypto enforcement, has formed a dedicated 

. This group is working to simplify registration processes, outline disclosure expectations and provide clarity as to which tokens qualify as securities. Notably, the SEC has softened its stance on certain categories of cryptocurrencies, such as 

, indicating they may no longer be treated as securities.

Banking regulators have also relaxed their oversight. The Federal Reserve 

 prior guidance requiring banks to notify regulators before engaging in crypto-related activities, opting instead for standard supervisory oversight. Likewise, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has 

 that banks can participate in permissible crypto activities without prior approval as long as they manage risks appropriately.

State-level regulations, however, remain highly fragmented. 

 with crypto-friendly policies, offering clear licensing and legal protections that attract 

 businesses. In contrast, some states still maintain stricter or underdeveloped frameworks, resulting in a regulatory patchwork that complicates compliance for companies operating across state lines.

In other developments, the federal government has launched the 

, an unprecedented move that integrates digital assets into national infrastructure planning. While this initiative signals strong institutional interest, it also introduces new compliance challenges for both government agencies and market participants.

What regulatory issues exist for cryptocurrency?

Cryptocurrency regulation in the US in 2025 continues to grapple with several persistent challenges, despite efforts to establish clearer frameworks. 

Why this matters for crypto traders and the industry

As crypto matures from the fringes of finance into the mainstream, clear rules and oversight are needed to protect individuals and to nurture a stable, trustworthy ecosystem that benefits everyone involved.

The US is transitioning toward a pro-innovation crypto regime, with emphasis on deregulation, legislative clarity and strategic asset management. Its nascent administration has signaled a significant departure from the previous enforcement-heavy approach, prioritizing regulatory clarity and industry growth. Key actions include the January 2025 executive order establishing an interagency task force to review and potentially rescind restrictive regulations, alongside the SEC’s dismissal of high-profile cases against Coinbase, Robinhood Crypto and OpenSea. 

Meanwhile, the SEC’s Crypto Task Force, led by Hester M. Peirce, aims to streamline registration paths for tokens and clarify jurisdictional boundaries, particularly for meme coins, which the SEC no longer classifies as securities. In addition, the 

 removes barriers for banks offering crypto custody services, thus encouraging institutional participation.

Bipartisan efforts are gaining momentum in the push to formalize crypto oversight, with stablecoin regulation leading the charge. Key proposals like the 

 are pushing for requirements such as 1:1 reserves, regular audits and greater transparency from issuers, bringing stablecoins more in line with traditional financial standards. 

 and SEC are working out jurisdictional boundaries, and Congress is expected to pass market structure legislation that will determine whether crypto assets are classified as securities or commodities. These moves are designed to reduce the regulatory landscape’s current fragmentation, as stablecoins now face a patchwork of state-level regulations that drive up compliance costs.

The US federal government is moving toward a clearer and more innovative crypto regulatory regime, making efforts to streamline oversight, push institutional adoption and integrate digital assets into economic strategy. However, until federal policies fully align and state differences are reconciled, the regulatory environment for crypto in the US remains complex and dynamic. Traders and industry players need to understand this complex but maturing environment in order to navigate risks and grab emerging opportunities.

us crypto regulations.png

Crypto regulations in the US: Navigating a complex landscape

Reports following Ether's landmark surge on May 7, 2025 largely attribute this rally to the completion of the Pectra upgrade.

Ether has recently regained its status as the crypto golden boy, leading a rally since May 7, 2025 that’s outpaced both Bitcoin and most altcoins. This unusual performance has prompted market observers to speculate on the reasons behind it, and whether this impressive trend will continue.

The ETH/BTC ratio has been declining since January 2024, when the SEC 

In Q1 2025, disappointment in Ether's performance reached its peak, driven by market drawdowns and concerns about Ethereum Foundation leadership, leading to a significant exit of investors from the world’s second-largest cryptocurrency. However, on May 7, 2025, the market narrative changed abruptly as Ether surged over 20% in just one day.

Reports following Ether's landmark surge on May 7, 2025 largely attribute this rally to the completion of the 

 upgrade. While the timing of the upgrade coincides perfectly with Ether's rebound, however, this view doesn't capture the full story.

Historically, the ETH/BTC ratio began to rebound two months before the official completion of 

. Similarly, the Pectra upgrade had been anticipated for some time. Despite its smooth execution, the market had low expectations regarding challenges in Q1 2025.

Moreover, Ether's resurgence coincided with BTC surpassing $100,000, as broader risk assets rallied due to positive developments in US tariff negotiations with the UK and China.

In summary, the overall asset rally triggered Ether's rise, while the Pectra upgrade enhanced its performance against Bitcoin. Additionally, Ether's strong outperformance over other altcoins likely resulted from significant short liquidations.

In the days following Ether's record rally, ETH experienced over $500 million in short liquidations. This phenomenon significantly contributed to the unusual surge of more than 20% in a single day for a leading token such as Ether.

The most common criticism of Ethereum is that it loses revenue to 

 (DEXs) for Ether has consistently declined, partly due to competition from other 

 blockchains such as Solana, as well as Ethereum's own L2 networks. Since most L2 solutions have their own utility tokens, the activities conducted on these platforms don’t directly generate fees for L1, since they bundle transactions and post them to the Ethereum Mainnet.

This dilemma doesn’t appear to have a quick fix. In the medium term, Ethereum’s key value proposition may need to shift from that of a profit-generating blockchain with a 

 asset to one that functions as a financial instrument that’s akin to a bond.

Ethereum’s staking feature has yet to face direct competition, and the amount staked within the ecosystem continues to grow. As of Q1 2025, approximately 34 million ETH are staked, yielding an annual return of 2.9%.

Ongoing developments in Hong Kong and Canada may allow ETH Spot ETFs to incorporate staking features. Notably, the Pectra upgrade increases the staking limit for each node from 32 ETH to 2048 ETH, which could incentivize ETF issuers to operate their own nodes in the future. Adding staking rewards to ETH Spot ETFs could enhance their attractiveness, especially as the Fed eventually returns interest rates to more typical levels.

With a 2.9% return on Ether staking, Ether is increasingly positioned as a bond-like investment.

Ethereum’s leadership change and future outlook

Vitalik Buterin’s recent proposals for Ethereum

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently 

 his vision for simplifying Ethereum's Layer 1 in a post titled 

, emphasizing that scalability alone is insufficient: Ethereum must also be understandable, maintainable and secure in order to reliably serve as a platform for civilization’s assets. Buterin proposes a significant reduction in complexity, aiming for an Ethereum that will be as simple (within five years) as Bitcoin is now. He believes that a simpler protocol will enhance security, attract more developers and facilitate easier upgrades.

To achieve this, Buterin introduces a beam chain proposal that aims to streamline consensus by reducing technical complexity, eliminating epochs and sync committees, simplifying fork choice rules and enhancing the validator lifecycle for easier onboarding and recovery. He advocates replacing the current Ethereum virtual machine (EVM) with RISC-V, a more efficient, general-purpose virtual machine. This transition promises a clearer specification that will reduce bugs and maintenance challenges; more flexibility for developers to use various programming languages; and the potential to increase throughput by 100 times.

To address existing applications, Buterin suggests a phased transition that introduces RISC-V precompiles and allows dual deployment options during the shift, gradually moving legacy features out of the core protocol to keep it lean. He also calls for standardizing tools within the network to reduce redundancy and complexity, proposing a unified encoding system, shared data splitting methods and a simpler state structure. Ultimately, Buterin believes that regaining simplicity is essential in order for Ethereum to maintain its flexibility and durability as it scales.

With a new road map for Ethereum and proposed leadership 

 to the Ethereum Foundation to make the Ethereum guardian more accessible, we believe Ethereum has more upside coming.

Advanced

MAY25_R15_Bybit Crypto Insights Report_ is Ether regaining favor_ How far will it go_.png

Bybit Crypto Insights Report: Is Ether regaining favor? How far will it go?

Unichain, Uniswap’s L2 network, now handles over 76% of Uniswap v4 volume, driven by UNI incentives and its new Rollup-Boost feature. 

The S&P 500 jumped 3.26% as US-China tariff easing lifted market sentiment. Investors now await CPI and retail data for signs of inflation trends under the new trade regime. Gold fell near $3,208 as easing US-China trade tensions reduced safe-haven demand. With CPI data ahead, further downside is likely. Technicals suggest bearish momentum, with key support at $3,202. The Coindesk Indices, which tracks the broader crypto market, fell 1.97%, with Bitcoin and Ether down 2.53% and 0.95%, in the past 24 hours. Trade these markets and more with up to 500x leverage on Bybit MT5 using this 

Today's top performer is RUNE, which surged by 4.4% following the completion of Halborn's security audit for Rujira Network's omnichain DeFi layer on THORChain.

THORChain (RUNE), created in 2018, is a decentralized protocol enabling native asset swaps across blockchains without wrapping. Built on Cosmos SDK and Tendermint, it uses Proof-of-Stake and Byzantine Fault Tolerance for secure cross-chain transactions. Halborn has 

 a smart contract security audit for Rujira Network, which is building an omnichain DeFi app layer on THORChain. Rujira enables seamless access to DeFi apps using native assets across connected chains.

Check out the latest prices, charts, and data of 

Unichain, Uniswap’s L2 network, now handles over 76% of Uniswap v4 volume, driven by UNI incentives and its new Rollup-Boost feature. This upgrade enhances MEV handling, cuts failed transaction gas costs, and sets the stage for Flashblocks—an upcoming 200ms block time system. Despite v4’s growth, Uniswap v3 still leads in total volume. The aim of Unichain is to solve Ethereum mainnet and L2 liquidity fragmentation while improving speed and decentralization.

Yesterday, BTC spot ETFs saw total outflows of $64.2 million, with $32.9 million from GBTC and $31.3 million from all other ETFs combined.

Multipli’s Season 1 has ended with 359.2M ORBs distributed (50% of supply). 

, allocating 30% of ORBs. Users can continue earning by keeping funds on mainnet or testnet—no action required. New users can join via testnet (free) or deposit stablecoins on BSC/Ethereum.

Beginner

1.png

Unichain leads Uniswap v4 activity with rollup-boost upgrade and upcoming flashblocks feature

Bybit Learn

Investing

Bitcoin

With asset classes like crypto and stocks gaining popularity, there'll certainly be bitcoin stock market correlation. Read on to see how interlinked they are.

Screen_Shot_2022-06-20_at_12.11.37.jpg

 was first introduced, many people thought one of its benefits would be that it was unrelated to the stock market. Investors hoped Bitcoin would be a suitable hedge – a safe place to protect funds from the volatility of the stock market. However, as the cryptocurrency has grown in popularity, many have started to wonder whether Bitcoin has a correlation to the stock market. Is Bitcoin's price affected by the stock market — and is this a good thing? Explore our guide to learn more about the nature of Bitcoin's correlation to the stock market.

The History of Crypto Correlation to the Stock Market

For the first several years of its life, there was almost no correlation between Bitcoin and the S&P 500. Until 2012, Bitcoin prices were very stable, while S&P 500 prices had their usual steady rise with some dips. The very first significant Bitcoin jump, in late 2013 and early 2014, had no corresponding S&P 500 increase. In fact, the stock market dip in late 2016 happened at the same time as a Bitcoin price increase. Bitcoin prices tended to fluctuate rapidly, while S&P 500 price changes were less drastic. Peaks and valleys for Bitcoin and S&P 500 prices showed almost no similarities until 2018 or so.

However, a look at recent Bitcoin vs. stock market charts shows far more correlation. The crypto's value doesn't perfectly mirror the S&P 500 index. However, a comparison of Bitcoin and the S&P 500 does show that there are some relationships. We can tell this by examining how the crypto behaves during volatile S&P price swings.

Over the past four years, Bitcoin has somewhat begun to mimic S&P 500 movements. During the big dips of January 2018, September 2018 and March 2020, Bitcoin prices also dropped. Interestingly, Bitcoin vs. stock market charts show that Bitcoin's drops seem to be even more drastic. While the S&P usually only experiences dips of around 10%, Bitcoin has weathered crashes of over 50%.

In the last three years, there has also been an increased incidence of Bitcoin moving when stocks rise. Overall, the correlation in Bitcoin vs. stock market charts is most drastic when stock prices drop. However, Bitcoin does seem to follow general market trends for stock stability and stock surges. Bitcoin has recently begun to mimic the stock market even more closely. In March, Bitcoin and the S&P 500's 90-day correlation reached record levels. As of 2022, there’s been no sign of a Bitcoin stock market decoupling.

Bitcoin vs. Stock Market Charts: What We Can Observe

When you take a close look at Bitcoin and Nasdaq composite prices over the past four years, the Bitcoin correlation to the stock market is even more noticeable. Based on Bitcoin vs. stock market charts, here are some of the key examples of Bitcoin’s correlation to the stock market.

What’s Causing the Bitcoin Stock Market Correlation?

There's no single reason for Bitcoin’s correlation to the stock market. Instead, there are multiple factors contributing to the similarities, based on Bitcoin vs. stock market charts. Just like the stock market, Bitcoin is closely affected by supply, demand and investor sentiments. Prices for both tend to rise when there’s high demand, positive market outlooks and limited supply. Meanwhile, prices for both tend to drop when investors worry about the future, or encounter worrying economic policies. Therefore, it's no surprise that Bitcoin tends to wax and wane with the stock market.

That being said, there are also some factors that would seem to reduce the correlation. Bitcoin isn't under the same regulations and government policies as the stock market. For example, the 2021 Chinese government shutdown of Bitcoin mining affected Bitcoin prices, but not those of the stock market. There are also technological dissimilarities, because the stock market isn't affected by data storage issues and power shortages which affect Bitcoin miners.

So why are the recent charts still showing so much correlation? The answer appears to lie in the increased connectivity of crypto and stocks. Cryptocurrency is no longer seen as a separate asset, with little reliance on the stock market. Instead, the popularity of crypto has made it very similar to traditional stock holdings. Crypto is no longer a niche asset traded by a few enthusiasts. Instead, it’s now being handled by traditional brokerages and investment institutions.

The same investors tend to invest in both crypto and stocks. Oftentimes, an investment portfolio may include both options. Furthermore, spillover from Bitcoin returns often gets invested in the stock markets, and vice versa. As the Bitcoin correlation to the stock market continues to increase, investors are becoming aware of the similarities — and making even more decisions with the assumption that crypto and stock are identical. Ultimately, the close relationship between stock and crypto investing is causing both markets to mimic each other.

The Benefits and Dangers of High Stock Market Correlation

Curious about what the Bitcoin and S&P 500 correlation means for the typical investor? There are both pros and cons to the Bitcoin stock market correlation. If there's a strong Bitcoin correlation, crypto investing becomes a lot more predictable. When Bitcoin vs. stock market charts are similar, you can more easily notice market trends and make smart choices. Furthermore, since stock values always rise in the long run, a Bitcoin correlation to the stock market could mean more long-term gains for crypto investors.

Though there are some benefits, you don't necessarily need to fear a Bitcoin stock market decoupling, which could actually be good news for investors who want to diversify their portfolios. Having two separate sets of assets that don't drop at the same time is a great way to weather financial crashes. If the Bitcoin stock market decoupling does occur, people may have more opportunities to hedge against a crash.

Ultimately, whether or not a Bitcoin stock market decoupling is a “good thing” just depends on your personal investment strategies. For those who have been using stock market predictions to make Bitcoin trading strategies, a high Bitcoin correlation to the stock market is a positive. Meanwhile, investors who haven't properly diversified their portfolios might find that Bitcoin's correlation to the stock market makes them more vulnerable to market downswings.

When dealing with investments, it's important to avoid assuming that correlation = causation. Essentially, the fact that Bitcoin vs. stock market charts look so similar doesn't necessarily mean one market is drastically affecting the other. In some cases, Bitcoin's correlation to the stock market seems to be a coincidence. For example, the March 2019 dip in the stock market was due to increased aluminum tariffs, while the March 2019 dip in Bitcoin was due to international crackdowns on crypto.

However, there’s also a lot of evidence that Bitcoin might be directly influenced by the stock market. Experts have noticed that Bitcoin prices tend to drop when the stock market opens — irrespective of other factors affecting price. Furthermore, Bitcoin's price is heavily affected by general investor confidence, which is why recent Bitcoin crashes tend to come right after stock crashes. Crypto traders who start hearing news about a stock market downturn tend to begin trading conservatively.

Will Bitcoin Decouple From the Stock Market?

If your investment strategy has  focused on Bitcoin following the stock market, you need to be on the lookout for a Bitcoin stock market decoupling. Experts predict that such an event probably won't be happening anytime soon. As more and more people begin to conflate Bitcoin charts and stock market charts, the two assets are even more likely to affect each other. At least a mild correlation to the stock market seems likely to persist for the rest of the year.

That being said, some degree of Bitcoin stock market decoupling does seem inevitable. The main reason is that Bitcoin tends to be a little more volatile. In a sell-off, Bitcoin prices tend to plummet a little more drastically than traditional stocks and recover more sharply. With stock prospects for the latter half of 2022 looking grim, there may be indications that Bitcoin’s value will begin to fluctuate at different rates than those of stocks values.

As of now, it’s hard to tell if a Bitcoin stock market decoupling will be positive or negative for crypto investors. Some feel that Bitcoin might stabilize while stocks drop, and others believe crypto values may decrease even after the stock market recovers. Either way, signs that a Bitcoin stock market decoupling might be happening include:

Bitcoin vs. stock market charts show a strong correlation between the two investment opportunities. Since both markets are becoming increasingly interrelated, it's no surprise that they're similar at the moment. However, experts believe a Bitcoin stock market decoupling will eventually happen. Investors would be wise to exercise caution and to beware assumptions of a continued Bitcoin stock market correlation.

Bitcoin Stock Market Correlation: What Do the Charts Say?

Compete for 2,500 USDT Every Week

Bitcoin Stock Market Correlation: What Do the Charts Say?

Grab Up to 5,000 USDT in Rewards

Compete for 2,500 USDT Every Week

Grab Up to 5,000 USDT in Rewards