Aptos (APT) is a scalable Layer 1 blockchain using Move language, offering fast transactions, modular upgrades, and a growing ecosystem of Web3 projects.

Aptos has emerged as a standout in the blockchain space, raising 

 from such venture capitalists as Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Coinbase Ventures, Apollo, Circle Ventures and Franklin Templeton to build its dream project promising a flexible and upgradeable blockchain structure. It lived up to its promises, with a successful mainnet launch on Oct 12, 2022. 

Two years later, Aptos has surpassed $1 billion in 

 (TVL), an impressive feat showcasing its ability to achieve real-world adoption as it attracts millions of users worldwide.

, giving users improved scalability, reliability, security and usability.

The Aptos genesis occurred on October 12, 2022, with Aptos blockchain's mainnet "Aptos Autumn" launched on October 17, 2022. Aptos is a Layer 1 blockchain built with a Rust-based programming language called Move. Its key features include a parallel execution engine, high-level security features and low transaction costs.

The Aptos blockchain is generating all this hype because of its intriguing past. The blockchain is based on the Diem blockchain initiative (from Meta) that was recently abandoned. Created by Diem developers, the Aptos crypto uses the programming language originally created for Diem. Its focus is on Diem's original goal of creating a scalable, fast blockchain. 

Aptos’s flexible architecture means it can be constantly upgraded to support emerging new use cases as the 

 world becomes increasingly sophisticated. Currently, Aptos is capable of supporting 

 (AI) on its blockchain. Its myriad use cases have drawn over 8 million users worldwide.

The Aptos network was created by Aptos Labs, while the Aptos Foundation focuses on nurturing the ecosystem through grants, education initiatives, events and partnerships.

Aptos Labs is the team behind the Aptos project. They currently lead a diverse team of developers, engineers and strategists headed by co-founders Mo Shaikh and Avery Ching.

Shaikh and Ching met when they worked together on the Diem blockchain project at Meta. Shaikh specializes in scaling products, and has experience in the private equity and venture capital markets. Meanwhile, Ching was one of the principal software engineers at Meta and has led many exciting and innovative development projects in the past. When Meta chose to discontinue the Diem project, Shaikh and Ching decided to join together to create Aptos Labs.

. Besides the Aptos blockchain, Aptos Labs has a range of products that cater to bridging the gap between Web 2.0 and web3. These include 

, a user-friendly web3 wallet that offers seamless access to 

, a name service that allows users to convert their lengthy and complex 

, a dedicated Aptos AI chatbot developed with OpenAI technology.

, whereby token holders stake tokens to their selected validators to help maintain the network. Aptos can theoretically reach 160,000 

 (TPS) while maintaining security and reliability. The following revolutionary concepts are at work behind Aptos's impressive performance.

 creates an engine that efficiently handles 

. The Aptos blockchain engine relies on parallel execution to handle multiple transactions at once. This makes things a lot quicker because a single failed transaction won't halt the whole chain. Instead, transactions can be processed concurrently, and all of them are validated post-execution. To further improve efficiency, a collaborative scheduler works to prioritize certain transactions on the Aptos blockchain and handle essential validations efficiently. Ultimately, up to 160,000 transactions per second (TPS) may be processed simultaneously.

One of the things that makes Aptos’s network so appealing is 

 for swift, secure transactions that was first designed for the Diem blockchain. Move is a type of executable bytecode language that’s used to 

implement smart contracts and custom transactions

. It uses Move modules, which are grouped in upgradeable packages, to define the state of transactions. 

It’s flexible enough to handle the unique needs of Aptos developers, and its global storage is more secure than the average programming language. Move lets users define custom resources that can’t be copied or discarded, making it much more difficult for malicious entities to control the Aptos blockchain. 

Aptos has also made multiple improvements to the Move ecosystem to further enhance its security, such as the 

, a formal verifier for Move smart contracts which boosts protection for contract invariants.

Aptos employs a modular data model, in which a ledger state records the interaction of transactions and accounts. Accounts are representations of users’ control over their assets, from on-chain currency to NFTs, and must be created before they can execute transactions. Transactions submitted by any user modify the ledger state and trigger events coded via Move modules. These events, uniquely identified by keys, are then stored as data within the ledger. This design also ensures flexibility and user privacy, as it supports flexible key management and hybrid custodial options, and allows users to create multiple pseudonymous accounts via cryptographic key pairs.

Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) Consensus Protocol

Instead of using a consensus protocol that has to follow the order of transactions, Aptos decouples the two processes and lets them run parallel to each other. This reduces latency (the time it takes to confirm network transactions) while increasing speed. To ensure accuracy, Aptos has created a Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT) engine that analyzes individual states on-chain and then automatically updates validators as needed.

The Aptos ecosystem is robust, with over 190 projects in the realms of DeFi, GameFi, NFTs, social media, education, AI, infrastructure and more.

. Once an APT holder stakes their APT tokens to a validator node, they’re eligible to vote for various protocol changes, such as blockchain upgrades and changes to blockchain parameters. There was 

 of 1 billion APT tokens, distributed as follows:

 isn’t merely used for governance, as APT token holders can also stake their tokens to a validator to help secure the network while earning rewards, which can be received at 

There’s a minimum stake of 1 million APT and a maximum of 50 million APT, with the staked tokens automatically locked for a fixed duration. The maximum annual reward rate, evaluated at every epoch, began at 7% in 2022, with an annual decline rate of 1.5% (until it eventually reaches 3.25%, which Aptos estimates will take over 50 years). 

To further facilitate decentralization, Aptos also started offering delegated staking for users from April 2023. Delegated staking features a low minimum staking requirement whereby users with as little as 11 APT can collectively stake in a trusted validator node. This move encourages more active participation, allowing more users to stake and earn rewards while helping to sustain a stable and efficient network. 

Staking rewards raise the total supply, making APT an 

 token. However, the rewards mechanism may be modified via on-chain governance.

Aptos is available on Bybit’s Spot market as a swap pair with USDT (

As of Nov 19, 2024, APT’S price is $11.68, which is 41.4% lower than its ATH of $19.92 on Jan 26, 2023 and 279.2% higher than its ATL of $3.08 on Dec 29, 2022. 

Price prediction experts generally have a positive outlook on the APT token. Changelly, while 

 a slight dip to $9.85 in 2025, anticipates APT will exceed $100 by 2030 and hit an astonishing average of $4,727 in 2040. CoinCodex is more conservative in its predictions, 

 APT will trade at an average rate of $31.22 in 2025 and $37.05 in 2030. 

There are several factors working together to make Aptos crypto seem like a great opportunity. First of all, the venture is a continuation of a Meta-founded project that was already getting positive results before it was canceled. Furthermore, the developers working on it are experienced, highly-trained people who've worked on exciting projects in the past.

Aptos’s innovative technology has captured the interest of many venture capitalists, making it one of the top-funded blockchain projects at a total of $350 million (split into two rounds). 

Aptos accepted its first big set of investments in March 2022. Several large venture capital groups, including a16z Crypto, Multicoin Capital, Hashed, Tiger Global, Three Arrows Capital, FTX Ventures and Coinbase Ventures contributed a total of $200 million. Aptos then went on to receive another $150 million in June from FTX Ventures and Jump Crypto. Previous investors, such as a16z crypto and Multicoin Capital, have contributed to multiple rounds of funding.

Thanks to its unique architecture, which separates consensus from execution, and its use of Move as a programming language for added security, Aptos certainly stands out from the crowd of Layer 1 projects. 

In a mere two years, Aptos has achieved a TVL of over $1 billion and attracted over 190 projects, including top DeFi platforms like PancakeSwap, Ondo Finance (the biggest stablecoin by market cap) and USDT.

Aptos has also secured partnerships with industry giants and global asset management leaders, such as BlackRock and Franklin Templeton, and entertainment titan NBCUniversal, further contributing to its credibility as one of the top Layer 1 blockchains.

All of these factors point to a bright future ahead for Aptos. Nevertheless, the crypto market is inherently volatile. As with any other cryptocurrency, before buying APT, please make sure you do 

Aptos, often dubbed the “Solana killer,” possesses plenty of features that help it stand out among other Layer 1 chains — including a highly active community, strong partnerships, and access to unique engines and programming languages. 

One of the Aptos blockchain's main competitors is 

, which is currently the hottest high-performance Layer 1 available. 

Theoretically, Solana can support up to 65,000 TPS, while Aptos is capable of supporting 160,000. While the actual performance of both blockchains falls far below their theoretical speeds, they’re still considered high-speed blockchains, with Solana 

. Apart from their fast speeds, both Aptos and Solana also appeal to many users due to their meager transaction costs, which average around $0.0001 per transaction. 

, having had notable outages and downgrades. Meanwhile, the Aptos blockchain adds redundancy to its network, rendering it less prone to failure. Each block in Aptos is synced with leader nodes and nearby nodes. In case the leader node fails, one of the other nodes can take over. This results in slightly more computational requirements, so Aptos' hardware needs are a little larger than Solana's. Ultimately, Aptos offers more reliability than Solana in exchange for slightly higher hardware requirements.

 use Move programming language, though Sui’s version is modified into an object-centric model, unlike Aptos’s account-centric model. 

Additionally, Aptos records its ledger on a blockchain, whereas Sui stores and organizes its data in a 

Both Aptos and Sui are built to be scalable, with Aptos presenting a high throughput of 160,000 TPS in its testnet days and Sui’s test throughput achieving 120,000. When both networks are launched on the mainnet, however, their maximum throughputs over the past 30 days have fallen to 

While the two networks’ scalability allows for varied use cases, Sui’s focus is on NFT games, with a recent expansion into DeFi. In contrast, Aptos is built to be more general purpose, encompassing a diverse range of applications from DeFi, GameFi and NFTs to social media, entertainment and even AI.

The Aptos blockchain has already managed to outperform 

 in terms of speed. While Ethereum's time to finality is over a minute, Aptos can finalize transactions in less than a second, due to both hardware and design differences. Ethereum only has one CPU core, while Aptos operates on 16.

However, Ethereum’s reliability is undeniably superior. While Aptos doesn't have many problems with outages, it can't compare to Ethereum's stability: Its performance is almost impossible to disrupt. As long as users are fine with paying more fees and waiting longer times, Ethereum still remains the more popular choice.

The Aptos project promises to increase blockchain scalability and reliability. 

Indeed, thanks to its innovative technology, Aptos has proven its credibility in just two short years, drawing over 190 projects to join its ecosystem and enabling it to scale rapidly and evolve to match market demand. 

While it remains to be seen whether Aptos will really be a “Solana killer,” its network is rapidly catching up to Solana’s popularity, as evidenced by its growing ecosystem and partnerships with industry leaders. 

The addition of the world’s largest stablecoin, USDT, to the Aptos blockchain further cements its position as the top blockchain of choice for users and developers seeking a scalable, secure and user-friendly platform. 

With its focus on modularity and upgradeability, Aptos continues to attract significant attention from the web3 community, revealing itself to be a formidable player in the race for blockchain dominance.

Intermediate

aptos.png

What Is Aptos (APT): A Scalable Modular Layer 1 for Seamless Upgrades

Ethena Foundation has approved the activation of its fee switch, enabling revenue sharing with ENA token holders by the end of the month.

Daily Top Performer — Hedera Hashgraph (HBAR)

The S&P 500 rose 0.39%, rebounding from recent declines, driven by optimism about potential future rate cuts and expectations of a business-friendly administration. Coindesk Indices, an index measuring broader cryptocurrency market performance was up by 0.73%, with Bitcoin and Ethereum rising by 2.16% and 2.81%, respectively in the past 24 hours.

Today's top performer is HBAR, which surged 44.6% following the expansion of Hedera's governance and its advancements in AI data transparency.

Hedera Hashgraph (HBAR), launched on September 2019, is a cryptocurrency network that supports fast transactions and application deployment, overseen by a select group of business-approved nodes. This design ensures quick finality and reliability, attracting major corporations like LG, IBM, and Boeing as participants. Hedera's Governing Council has 

 to 32 members as the platform introduces new features and diverse use cases, such as using immutable records to enhance trust in AI data. The focus remains on transparency, security, and innovation for a promising future.

Check Out the Latest Prices, Charts, and Data of 

, enabling revenue sharing with ENA token holders by the end of the month. This move follows a governance vote and has already led to a significant increase in the ENA token's value. Ethena, which has achieved record-high revenues recently, generates income through various yield strategies. As one of the largest DeFi protocols by TVL, Ethena's fee switch could set a significant precedent for revenue sharing in the DeFi space.

Yesterday, BTC Spot ETF flows reached $165.5M, consisting of $5.8M from GBTC and $159.7M from non-GBTC sources.

 to drive onchain growth and reward users for trading NFTs and tokens across chains. With a total supply of 1 billion, over half will be allocated to the community through rewards, staking, and ecosystem development, with an initial 12.5% claim available at the Token Generation Event (TGE). The $ME token will power governance, staking, and user incentives across Bitcoin, Solana, and EVM ecosystems, supporting Magic Eden's goal of creating a universal onchain trading platform. The ME Foundation, a non-profit, will oversee the $ME ecosystem, ensuring security and alignment with community interests while cautioning users to beware of scams ahead of TGE.

Beginner

4.png

Ethena Foundation Approves Fee Switch for Revenue Sharing with ENA Holders

In this tutorial, we’ll explore how you can complete a series of tasks in Derive for Bybit Web3 Airdrop Arcade.

In this tutorial, we’ll explore how you can complete Derive tasks for Bybit Web3 Airdrop Arcade. 

Task: Trade More Than $10 USD on Perps/Options, or Deposit More Than $10 Into Vaults

 and connect your Bybit Wallet by clicking on the 

button at the top right corner of the page. 

you want to deposit. Then, indicate the amount. Derive allows you to use stablecoins, such as USDC and USDT, or tokens, such as ETH, wstETH and WBTC, as collateral. Please note that deposits take between five to 10 minutes to complete.

to transfer your tokens into a trading account. This will allow you to trade with margin. 

: Trade at least $10 worth of perpetuals or options. 

 page and connect your Bybit Wallet by clicking on the 

button at the top right corner of the page.

: Select a vault based on your preferred collateral, market outlook and risk tolerance. Vaults automatically execute yield-generating options strategies on your deposited tokens.

. Please note that deposits take between 10 to 20 minutes to complete.

derive tutorial.png

How to Complete Derive Tasks for Bybit Web3 Airdrop Arcade

In this tutorial, we’ll explore how you can complete a series of tasks in KiloEx for Bybit Web3 Airdrop Arcade.

In this tutorial, we’ll explore how you can complete KiloEx tasks for Bybit Web3 Airdrop Arcade. 

Task 1: Deposit at Least 10 USDT in the KiloEx Vault via opBNB

 in the navigation bar to enter the KiloEx Vault. 

: Enter at least 10 USDT as the amount you would like to deposit, and click on 

: Approve the transaction and confirm it. 

: Check your deposit status. Please note that as you’re not able to withdraw immediately, you’ll need to wait for 1–3 epochs.

: Once the above steps have been completed, you can click on the 

button to withdraw your deposited amount.

Task 2: Place a Position With at Least 10 USDT

: If your BNB or USDT is insufficient, you can follow the bridge tutorial 

: After bridging funds, choose your desired trading pair and place an order to 

: The minimum position value for this task is $10. To minimize your risk of 

, we suggest opening a position with 2x leverage and maintaining a margin of $5. In this example, we’ve used a minimum of 2x leverage to open a position and select 

: Confirm your order and your position will be created. 

kiloex tutorial.png

How to Complete KiloEx Tasks for Bybit Web3 Airdrop Arcade

Web3 Experts

Learn more about value accrual in the modular stack with insights from our guest author, Gabe.

2401-T16454_Skinny_Banner_for_Blog_and_Learn_Row_53_728x90.png

Skinny_Banner-1600x400.webp

Gabe was formerly with the listings team at Coinbase, and is an author from Shoal Research, a firm specializing in DeFi and infrastructure research.

 have been all the rave, but one often overlooked aspect of them is that they fragment value. In a world where we have one monolithic blockchain, all value accrues to this blockchain’s ecosystem — but that’s not the case with modular blockchains.

This is due to their inherent design. Modularity, as it relates to core blockchain components, means that different layers specialize (i.e., do what they’re best at), and the best layers for data availability and consensus, settlement and execution are coupled into one blockchain, which when presented to the end user allows them to get a better product at a lower price. (The reasons why blockchain components such as data availability and consensus are grouped will be touched upon later in this post, as well as execution and settlement.)

Elaborating on this theme, the modular stack’s main benefit materializes with users being able to access cheaper and better blockspace (better in the sense that this specialization allows for total blockspace to expand exponentially; more on this below). As the number of blockchains proliferates, it will unlock applications that we haven’t even thought of yet — much the way broadband unlocked social media for us, as well as better security guarantees. Developers of applications also need to worry less about the “ideal” stack for them; they can just plug and play, subsequently deploying their app. So when the functions of all these core components are carried out by different blockchains, where exactly does value accrue?

But before getting to that, let’s get a little deeper into modular blockchains. One reason the modular blockchain narrative is going to be instrumental for the paradigm shift into blockchain technology and web3, in general, is that it allows us to scale bandwidth without compromising on the very reasons blockchains are so interesting — censorship resistance, vitality and credible neutrality.

In essence, with modular blockchains, we can try to make the best trade-offs on the blockchain trilemma (see above) by scaling in layers. Take Ethereum as an example: with modular blockchains, Ethereum can be used as a settlement layer, since it has the most (and the most geographically distributed set of) validators (as well as a lot of solo stakers and overall less cloud concentration, see 

). In addition, Ethereum’s chain is arguably being secured by the best crypto money after Bitcoin — Ether. But effectively, Ethereum is well suited to be a settlement layer, making it a place to have the 

, as well as dispute resolution (such as for fraud/fault proofs).

Now, with regard to scalability, we do this on layers built on top of Ethereum, much like we do in TradFi (for example, Stripe or something like PayPal is built on top of many financial layers, and usually banks, say every week or so, settle up on the base layer using 

, i.e., the Federal Reserve settlement system). Nic Carter, in 

 with Lex Fridman, breaks it down well (it’s worth noting that TradFi is at an advantage since it utilizes centralized databases to record transfers, etc., while blockchains are distributed ledgers that require cooperation of thousands of nodes to append and verify). 

This mechanism takes the form of rollups and other scaling solutions, rollups being the predominant one, which solely specialize in execution ( basically, just running code in an execution environment, which takes the form of the 

 for Ethereum and Ethereum rollups), and can hence make some trade-offs when it comes to decentralization and security (this is another post in and of itself). Rollups also need 

 and, by extension, consensus in order to function, and while this can be done by Ethereum, it can be outsourced (trade-offs here, too) to blockchains like 

A nice example of a project that embraces modularity is 

, which uses Ethereum as a settlement layer and Celestia as a DA+consensus layer, achieving execution by itself using the 

 (Solana virtual machine) as its execution environment. The SVM is creating a lot of buzz right now as one of the only multithreaded virtual machines, allowing for 

 (basically transactions to be processed in parallel to each other), unlike the EVM, which is single-threaded. Hence, sequential transactions are the norm and parallelization isn’t possible.

Let me precede all this by saying that Ethereum in and of itself 

a modular blockchain, in the sense that it can do everything (data availability, consensus, execution and settlement) by itself, but can be used by other blockchains and layers of the modular stack (for example, execution layers like rollups) for functions such as settlement, which then makes Ethereum a component of 

The way this meme can be understood is that everything is a modular blockchain, and everything is a monolithic blockchain (performing all the functions on the base layer, like Solana), depending upon how you look at it. For example, if I built a rollup on Solana, is Solana itself a monolithic blockchain, or a modular one? Likewise for Ethereum. Even Celestia can achieve execution and settlement as well, but if it’s only utilized for data availability and consensus, then it's a modular blockchain (you get the point).

By embracing modular blockchains, different blockchains can specialize in what they do to fulfill the requirements to have an “optimized” blockchain, as I’ve elucidated above.

Which one of these layers (data availability/DA for short, consensus, settlement or execution) will capture the most amount of value (have the most value accrual)?

This post was inspired after discovering the following 

1) For a DA layer to work, you need some kind of ordering on that layer (hence, DA layers come with their own consensus, i.e., ordering protocols), so in this modular stack, consensus and DA aren’t two separate things. Just imagine using data available on one chain in order to create proofs, but this data (because it's on a blockchain) is ordered in some other way by another chain. It’s just a mess.

2) Execution layers like Arbitrum have pricing (discrimination) power, while DA layers like Celestia do not. This is because Celestia provides a homogeneous service (data availability), while Arbitrum (and other rollups like Optimism; I’m just taking Arbitrum as a main example) provides an execution environment for some of the best crypto apps not found elsewhere. This in itself is one reason why Arbitrum makes a significant amount of revenue (some hundreds of thousands of dollars per day), while Celestia makes negligible fees (less than $100 per day at the time of writing, as seen below, though this is also a function of Celestia’s nascency). 

Arbitrum is also closer to the end user, due to their monopoly on sequencing (the foundation runs the only sequencer). While this will change in the future — for example, with the adoption of 

 — the Arbitrum protocol (sequencer, builder, searcher) will still be the only one to receive user fees, and most importantly, MEV and some part of the fees will trickle down to the DA layer as the rollup/execution environment will still write the data to Celestia, etc.! And remember, if DA layers captured most of the value, then rollups today would be charging lower fees to users than the cost to post/write data to the DA layer (i.e., operating at a loss, which is not the case today).

Anatoly Yakovenko (the founder of Solana) 

 this phenomenon in depth on the Lightspeed podcast.

3) Settlement layers are more valuable than DA+consensus layers (and I’d argue execution layers) simply because of the fact that the settlement layer will be secured by the most money/money-like crypto asset, as in the case of the most credibly neutral settlement layer today, Ethereum, which is secured by ETH. A DA+consensus layer will inevitably have more activity/volume flowing through it, relative to the settlement layer (which will only be used for bridging and dispute resolution, so occasionally, block headers will be posted to it from the DA+consensus layer). But the settlement layer’s asset will still be more valuable, albeit the settlement layer is “doing less.” Just look at TRX vs. ETH; the former’s blockchain handles more volume and burns more of its native token than Ethereum’s, and yet it’s valuated at magnitudes less than ETH. 

Simply put, the monetary premium is the multiple at which an asset trades relative to its fundamentals/fundamental utility (due to its “moneyness”). Gold is a good example: it's not used so much in the economy for production processes — and yes, it also looks good — but most of its value comes from its hard money trait. Case in point. 

 for this point, who puts it better than I do:

the most valuable part of the stack is settlement, then execution, and then DA+consensus

, for all the reasons mentioned above (this is why I’m not delineating between DA and consensus).

My argument can be summed up as follows: The settlement layer is the most valuable because of monetary premiums, and execution is much more valuable than DA+consensus because the latter provides a homogenous service where competition is fierce, and costs (and hence revenue for the DA+consensus layer) will trend to 0 (slightly unrelated, but 

 is great and talks about why these sorts of businesses don’t make sense to pursue). Meanwhile, the former (execution) layers can build network effects at a much greater rate and solidify them with mass liquidity! (They’re also much closer to the users, and they don’t compete on fees!)

Let me explain this point a little more. Right now, rollups such as Optimism and Arbitrum pay more than 90% of their costs (which are actually paid by users) for DA (this 

 expands on what I’m saying), something they want to minimize. Therefore, they might switch to Celestia for DA (and hence consensus), thus lowering their cost (and therefore their revenue) drastically (right now, data on Celestia costs pennies for rollups; if Arbitrum wrote as much data as it did today to Ethereum to Celestia, it would only pay a few thousand dollars — 

 has done good research on this). But users don’t care about small fee increments between rollups! I don’t care if I’m paying $0.01 for a swap on Rollup A when I could be paying $0.007 for a swap on Rollup B, simply because I don’t swap that much, and bridging my assets is a hurdle and entails security risks. But for a rollup —which is, after all, a business posting thousands of megabytes of data to the DA layer — these “increments” in cost matter a lot because they add up. Basically, rollups are price-elastic (

 price elastic). But rollup users aren’t, to a large degree.

From fat protocols to fat applications, modeling value accrual in the blockchain landscape isn’t a new endeavor. The advent of modularity introduces new components to the public blockchain landscape, as well as new economic and value dynamics. Modular blockchains represent a paradigm shift in the blockchain stack — from building a complete integrated network that can serve all four blockchain functions on the base layer, to building networks which use specialized layers for fulfilling these functions optimally.

 is the most valuable component of the stack, underpinned by the monetary premiums associated with the underlying asset. 

 layers follow closely behind. In contrast, 

 despite providing essential functions, face growing competition and diminishing revenue potential due to their semblance to commodities.

In short, the order of value accrual in the modular stack is as follows:

Value Accrual in the Modular Stack: Unpacking Where Value Might Accrue in a Modular Blockchain Future

Grab Up to 5,000 USDT in Rewards

Grab Up to 5,000 USDT in Rewards